CIO Magazine Tech Poll Reveals Momentum in Mobile App Investments

CIO Magazine Tech Poll Reveals Momentum in Mobile App Investments

IT Leaders Embrace Next Waves of IT Innovation

FRAMINGHAM, MA–(Marketwired – Dec 19, 2013) – IDG’s CIO — the executive-level IT media brand providing insight into business technology leadership — releases the CIO Magazine Tech Poll results for November 2013. According to the poll, a majority of IT leaders plan to increase IT spending in the next year across multiple edge technologies.

Results from more than 200 top IT executives reveals that organizations, on average are seeing an overall increase of 5.2% to their budgets in the coming year, with an investment focus on enabling business process innovation. Aligning with this business objective, IT leaders continue to allocate more of their budget on edge technologies, particularly, mobile apps (58%), tablets (55%), business intelligence and analytics (54%), and cloud computing (51%). Currently, 52% of enterprises are researching or piloting mobile apps, with an additional 23% already producing a mobile app for their business unit or division.

Read the rest of the article at

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The False Dilemma Fallacy

By Robert L. Cain, Copyright 2013 Cain Publications, Inc.

Remember when we were kids?  Well, us males, anyway.  A common 12-year-old male’s question to his fellow 12-year-olds was something to the effect “Would you rather _________ or ______?”  It was a choice between two gross and disgusting options. (Males, you can fill in the blanks because I am sure you remember the various options.) That was our introduction to the false dilemma fallacy.  We had to choose between two objectionable things, without the choice of “neither.” In fact, if we objected that neither was something we wanted, the 12-year-old asking the question would tell us we didn’t have that option: we had to choose.

Today, all grown up now, we see this come up in poll questions.  The June 6-9, 2013 poll by the Pew Research Center illustrates that.  They asked, for all intents and purposes, “Would you rather have terrorists running around loose or give up your freedom?” as if there were no other option.  Pollsters are good at disguising questions that if worded differently would elicit a response of “neither” or “I’m not going to answer such a ridiculous question.” This one was worded “NSA is getting secret court orders to track calls of millions of Americans to investigate terrorism.”  Is that acceptable or not acceptable?

We can be safe from terrorism any number of ways that do not include intruding on people’s privacy and violating the Fourth Amendment right against illegal searches.

The question is a false dilemma because built in to that question is the requirement that it must be investigating terrorism or not investigating terrorism.  The option is keeping our Fourth Amendment rights or not. No other option. A more objective way to word it would have been “Which of the following methods do you feel the government should use to investigate terrorism while still abiding by our constitutional guarantees against illegal or intrusive searches?”  Then it could list several methods, one of which would be tracking people’s phone use.  We have to wonder how that would come out.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Considering Noses

By Robert L. Cain, Copyright 2005 Cain Publications, Inc.

Let us consider noses. Your nose belongs to you and my rights stop right where your nose starts. Noses are also used to stick in other people’s business. Noses that get stuck in other people’s business sometimes end up complaining about their rights.

“The right to swing my fist ends where the other man’s nose begins,” wrote Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

Let us consider what is best for people. I don’t know what is best for people. Rather I have to rely on them to decide. I know some things that are probably bad for them; some things are bad for me, too. Too many cookies are bad for me. The cigar I smoke once a month is probably bad for me. Having three drinks in an evening is probably bad for me.

Even so, I have to ask myself, am I sure what I think is bad is truly bad for them? It is not just a question of whether I am sure, either. It is also a question of whether I know a workable solution for what is bad for them. And if it truly is bad for them, and I know the solution to what is bad for them, does my nose belong in trying to sort out a solution for them?

Let us consider unintended consequences. You can’t do just one thing. You can never drop a pebble in the water and have it go straight to the bottom affecting nothing on the way down.

Watch the pebble. When the pebble drops in the water the first consequence is the ripples it creates that will go on and on until something gets in their way and stops them. What happens when the ripples hit something? Maybe nothing that we can perceive happens. Nonetheless, something happens at least on the atomic level that affects another atom, which affects another atom, which affects another, ad infinitum. We can in no way predict from there what the effect will be, can we? Chaos theorists have tried to predict, but it is still only speculation.

Watch the pebble. As it drops toward the bottom of the pond, it scares a fish who will dart out of the way. What will the fish run into? I don’t know, and neither does anyone else. But for the pebble, the fish probably would not have gone where it did at that moment.

Watch the pebble. When it hits the bottom of the pond it creates a crater of mud that sprays up in all directions. It is not a big crater, just a little one, almost unnoticeable. What will be the result of disturbing the mud? We certainly can’t predict that with any certainty whatsoever. Maybe a stash of frog eggs will be uncovered, providing food for the fish that just got scared by the pebble. That is bad news for tadpoles that will never become frogs, but good news for the fish.

Watch yourself. I’ll watch myself, too. Everything everyone does has consequences that cannot be predicted. Most assuredly you can predict an immediate consequence. If you pound a six-penny nail into a two-by-four, the board will have a new hole in it filled by a nail. What happens after that? If the nail goes all the way through into the surface beneath, it makes another hole. Maybe you shouldn’t have been using that table to pound on. Now the table has a hole and your wife sees it.

She gets angry with you and storms out of the house. While she is out, she passes a store that sells lottery tickets and decides to buy one. It turns out to be the winning ticket for the $100 million PowerBall jackpot. Now you can retire in luxury and buy all the tables you want. All that was the consequence of pounding a nail. Of course it could have turned out far differently. But we can never predict.

Let us consider technology. Modern technology has made it oh so much easier to drop pebbles into ponds and create waves that can go around and around the world. The invention of the word processor, for example, had the consequence of making it easier to write and fill up many more pages than necessary to say what we might have said 30 years ago in fewer pages.

The word processor has helped undermine good grammar and punctuation. That is certainly a big ripple. All kinds of opuses are self-published every day because they can be. They are published replete with grammatical and punctuation errors that make me cringe when I read them—at least as far as I read. People for some reason tend to believe things they see in print or on their computer screens. When they see improper use of the English language, they might think that either what they see is correct or “if proper English usage isn’t important to anybody else, why should it be to me?”

Modern technology in the form of the world-wide web has made it infinitely easier to communicate all kinds of information, true or not, interesting or not, well-researched or not, all around the world in an instant for everyone to read. In fact it seems as if a need has sprouted that compels people to try to be first with the news, regardless of how it comes out. Not entirely correct? Oh, well, we got there first. We can sort out what passes for truth later. Lying to so many people has never been so easy.

Since people believe what they see on the internet is correct; or they think what they see there is something to be emulated; or they think that when they see unethical and immoral people misbehaving it is acceptable, a consequence is an increasingly downward-spiral of ethics and morality. Is that the only cause of moral and ethical misbehavior? Certainly not, we have always had ethical misbehavior. Modern technology can’t take credit for lack of ethics. It is just so much more easily communicated today.

Let us consider noses again. The fist of the misuse of technology is either rapidly approaching our noses or has already hit them. The question is do we swing back? If so, what do we hit back with? Watch the pebble. When you drop the pebble into the modern technology morass, you can’t tell what the ultimate result will be.

Let us consider those unintended consequences before we swing back. What can we do to correct those easily perceived abuses, while saving the life of the technology goose that is laying the golden egg? Let us consider unintended consequences and noses.

I say with Thomas Jefferson, “The government that governs best governs least.” The society that interferes as little as possible in the lives of its citizens survives intact and prospers best.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Questions Trainers Ask

Questions Trainers Ask

Questions of Clarification
• What do you mean when you say ____?
• What is your main point?
• How does ____ relate to ____?
• Could you put that another way?
• Let me see if I understand you; do you mean ______ or ______?
• How does this relate to our problem/discussion/issue?
• Jane, can you summarize in your own words what Richard said? Richard, is that what you meant?
• Could you give me an example?
• Would ______ be a good example of that?

Questions that probe assumptions
• What are you assuming here?
• What is Jenny assuming?
• What could we assume instead?
• You seem to be assuming ______. Do I understand you correctly?
• All of your reasoning depends on the idea that ______. Why have you based your reasoning on ______ instead of ______?
• You seem to be assuming ______. How do you justify taking that for granted?
• Is that always the case? Why do you think the assumption holds here?
• Why would someone make that assumption?

Questions that probe reasons and evidence
• Could you explain your reasons to us?
• How does that apply to this case?
• Is there a reason to doubt that evidence?
• Who is in a position to know that is true?
• What would you say to someone who said that ______?
• Can someone else give evidence to support that conclusion?
• How could we find out if that is true?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

10 Office Technologies on Their Way Out

Seth FiegermanSep 25, 2012

Here’s a question you may not hear at all in 2017: “Did you get my fax?”

LinkedIn surveyed more than 7,000 global professionals about which tools and trends will disappear from offices in the next five years and which will become even more common. Nearly three quarters of those surveyed said they expected fax machines to disappear, making it the second most likely office technology to go extinct behind tape recorders.

Other once common office tools like the Rolodex, desk phones and even desktop computers ranked high on the list of items likely to become obsolete in the workplace. Meanwhile, more than half of professionals surveyed (55%) believe that tablets will become increasingly common in the office, the most of any technology on the list. Laptops also ranked high, with 34% of those surveyed predicting it would become more common.

The survey is just the latest example that workplaces are gradually abandoning analog technologies for digital. Those in the workforce will need to adapt to these changes or else risk having technological skills that are obsolete as well.

While it’s unlikely many workers will mourn the loss of the fax machine, some may be more nostalgic for other vanishing fixtures of office life like the Rolodex or business cards (which ranked 12th on the list.)

Here are the top 10 office tools and trends that professionals think will vanish in the next five years:

1. Tape recorders (79 percent)
2. Fax machines (71 percent)
3. The Rolodex (58 percent)
4. Standard working hours (57 percent)
5. Desk phones (35 percent)
6. Desktop computers (34 percent)
7. Formal business attire like suits, ties, pantyhose, etc. (27 percent)
8. The corner office for managers/executives (21 percent)
9. Cubicles (19 percent)
10. USB thumb drives (17 percent)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Help make this forum valuable

I am looking for ideas for posts to this forum.

If you have a topic to suggest or information to share, please post your thoughts.  I will do my best to add to the discussion with information and ideas.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment